November 2008 Archives
Top Ten!
Hey! I was surprised and excited this morning to learn that I've been chosen by LatinoStories.com as one of the 2009 Top Ten New Latino Authors to Watch (and Read). Go to LatinoStories.com and scroll down to "New! Announcing: Our 2009 Best New Latino Authors" to check it out.
This recognition is based on feedback that the site's editors have gotten throughout the year from readers, librarians, editors, and faculty, and it's also based on the editors' judgment. I was excited to see Stephanie Elizondo Griest, who's been on this blog here and here, included as well. I can't wait to read the other writers' work.
The news came as a total surprise, which was nice. (No applications to fill out, no fingers to cross.) Just a wonderful gift!
Speaking of which, you've sent $85 so far to relief efforts in Haiti, all in small amounts. Especially with the tough economic times we're having here, that's a lot, and it's making a difference to the children there. Thank you! Keep letting me know.
This recognition is based on feedback that the site's editors have gotten throughout the year from readers, librarians, editors, and faculty, and it's also based on the editors' judgment. I was excited to see Stephanie Elizondo Griest, who's been on this blog here and here, included as well. I can't wait to read the other writers' work.
The news came as a total surprise, which was nice. (No applications to fill out, no fingers to cross.) Just a wonderful gift!
Speaking of which, you've sent $85 so far to relief efforts in Haiti, all in small amounts. Especially with the tough economic times we're having here, that's a lot, and it's making a difference to the children there. Thank you! Keep letting me know.
| Tweet | ||
![]()
Books, Not Bombs
Innovative educators are changing the way rural Pakistani children get to learn. The lovely, enchanting six-minute video by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof is here. It'll make you smile.
The program he's reporting on, DIL, was founded in 1997 by Pakistani-Americans to address the educational deprivation of rural Pakistani children--particularly girls, who still suffer from the extreme sexism of provincial fundamentalism. Religion + patriarchy = full-time labor at the age of 8 to support their brothers' educations, or being traded as a child-bride at the age of 2 to an enemy clan to resolve a dispute. But that's changing. Watch the video and be charmed and heartened.
At DIL, the budget per child is $50 a year, but they manage to do so much with it. (A lesson for U.S. educators?)
The program he's reporting on, DIL, was founded in 1997 by Pakistani-Americans to address the educational deprivation of rural Pakistani children--particularly girls, who still suffer from the extreme sexism of provincial fundamentalism. Religion + patriarchy = full-time labor at the age of 8 to support their brothers' educations, or being traded as a child-bride at the age of 2 to an enemy clan to resolve a dispute. But that's changing. Watch the video and be charmed and heartened.
At DIL, the budget per child is $50 a year, but they manage to do so much with it. (A lesson for U.S. educators?)
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
"The situation is extremely, extremely fragile and dangerous."
Advocacy isn't the purpose of this blog.
But this shook me. As a person, as a mama: it shook me bad. So it's on my mind, and I'm putting it on yours.
I'll start with the full disclosure that makes me look like an obnoxious stereotype: I had ordered a Starbucks latte--venti--in the UNL student union, folks, and I was standing around, waiting for it to be ready, wishing my friend Sonam were holding office hours there, like he does, so I could chat with him and pass the time, and flipping through a newspaper someone had left on a table.
When my eyes fell on this image, they couldn't make visual sense of it. I thought it was a drawing, a sick cartoon. Those could not be arms. Those could not be legs.
But it was a photograph, a little girl, a real little girl, someone's real little four-year-old baby girl, fast on her way to dying of hunger.
Read the full AP story here.
So if you've seen or plan to see Quantum of Solace (partly set in Haiti--but the director filmed the Haiti scenes in Panama), if you were chilled by Edwidge Danticat's "Ghosts" in the latest New Yorker, if you've ever vacationed in the Caribbean or wanted to, please consider being more than a cultural tourist.
Please consider helping the real people there.
It's not our job. I know that. And it's not your fault or mine, not directly: it's the fault of unequal systems of distribution, decades of fucked-up politics, tropical storms that smashed through an already poverty-stricken country, the market-concocted food crisis--I know all that. And it's also fair to say that it's not our personal responsibility to fix: it's Haiti's, and the U.N.'s, and our government's, and other governments'.
You could ask, Am I my brother's keeper? and you'd be technically correct.
But 26 children have died in the past month. And 75 more children, including Venecia Lonis, are being treated for life-threatening malnutrition right now.
A child should never look like this. This should never happen.
There are things so wrong they hurt to look at. They hurt to know. They make us want to look away, to ease our own sick hurt. But that's choosing blindness. Don't.
You can donate to food programs in Haiti through the UN's World Food Programme--go here and click on the right. It's tax-deductible. Ten bucks makes a difference. And Doctors Without Borders, which is politically neutral and operates independently, is helping these children in Haiti right now, and you can donate here.
There are about 200 of us on this blog. That can add up to a whole lot of food and medical help. If you donate, please let me know. Add a comment, or drop me an email. "I donated $10." Tell me.
But this shook me. As a person, as a mama: it shook me bad. So it's on my mind, and I'm putting it on yours.
I'll start with the full disclosure that makes me look like an obnoxious stereotype: I had ordered a Starbucks latte--venti--in the UNL student union, folks, and I was standing around, waiting for it to be ready, wishing my friend Sonam were holding office hours there, like he does, so I could chat with him and pass the time, and flipping through a newspaper someone had left on a table.
When my eyes fell on this image, they couldn't make visual sense of it. I thought it was a drawing, a sick cartoon. Those could not be arms. Those could not be legs.
But it was a photograph, a little girl, a real little girl, someone's real little four-year-old baby girl, fast on her way to dying of hunger.
Read the full AP story here. So if you've seen or plan to see Quantum of Solace (partly set in Haiti--but the director filmed the Haiti scenes in Panama), if you were chilled by Edwidge Danticat's "Ghosts" in the latest New Yorker, if you've ever vacationed in the Caribbean or wanted to, please consider being more than a cultural tourist.
Please consider helping the real people there.
It's not our job. I know that. And it's not your fault or mine, not directly: it's the fault of unequal systems of distribution, decades of fucked-up politics, tropical storms that smashed through an already poverty-stricken country, the market-concocted food crisis--I know all that. And it's also fair to say that it's not our personal responsibility to fix: it's Haiti's, and the U.N.'s, and our government's, and other governments'.
You could ask, Am I my brother's keeper? and you'd be technically correct.
But 26 children have died in the past month. And 75 more children, including Venecia Lonis, are being treated for life-threatening malnutrition right now.
A child should never look like this. This should never happen.
There are things so wrong they hurt to look at. They hurt to know. They make us want to look away, to ease our own sick hurt. But that's choosing blindness. Don't.
You can donate to food programs in Haiti through the UN's World Food Programme--go here and click on the right. It's tax-deductible. Ten bucks makes a difference. And Doctors Without Borders, which is politically neutral and operates independently, is helping these children in Haiti right now, and you can donate here.
There are about 200 of us on this blog. That can add up to a whole lot of food and medical help. If you donate, please let me know. Add a comment, or drop me an email. "I donated $10." Tell me.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
"My Life in the City"
So I'm going to be teaching this story today by Sergio Troncoso, "My Life in the City," from the anthology Latino Boom, and I have fallen in love. I need to get his collection, The Last Tortilla & Other Stories, because I've become a total Troncoso geek on the strength of this story alone.
I don't know what it is, exactly, that's compelling me. Here's my fumbling attempt: "My Life in the City" (1999) feels like a twenty-first century story, and it feels international.
It has that texture, like its sensibility is informed by the international literature of the last sliver of the last century, like its concerns are the improbable turns of an idiosyncratic consciousness, neutrally observed. It feels more like now than a lot of the work we've been reading for class (which makes sense: we started with "I Am Joaquin" and have been working chronologically forward; as a professor, I'm interested in all the work we've read, but as a writer, I'm excited by this). "My Life in the City" feels honest, uninhibited, the voice of a watcher watching the ecstasy-hungry self as it moves through the world. This is how it opens:
But I'm hypnotized by the thing. It gives me the same kind of high that reading Kundera or Duras or Mercè Rodoreda gives me.
!Necesito Troncoso!
I don't know what it is, exactly, that's compelling me. Here's my fumbling attempt: "My Life in the City" (1999) feels like a twenty-first century story, and it feels international.
It has that texture, like its sensibility is informed by the international literature of the last sliver of the last century, like its concerns are the improbable turns of an idiosyncratic consciousness, neutrally observed. It feels more like now than a lot of the work we've been reading for class (which makes sense: we started with "I Am Joaquin" and have been working chronologically forward; as a professor, I'm interested in all the work we've read, but as a writer, I'm excited by this). "My Life in the City" feels honest, uninhibited, the voice of a watcher watching the ecstasy-hungry self as it moves through the world. This is how it opens:
I almost left the City because I could not find myself there anymore. I found many desires in the City. My gaze would never settle on one thing. It would jump from face to face to face. I enjoyed watching the many beautiful women in the City. Yes, I would study their faces and bodies. I would imagine making love to them. I would imagine their touch on my own body. Sometimes they would smile in return. Sometimes I would talk to them, and their eyes would sparkle. Often they would turn away. A few seemed angry at my open look. But I never meant any harm. I simply wanted to find myself there, to find someone, and I wanted to reach out. But there was nothing there. Or else, it was simply too far away. They were too far away. I was not there. I did not know where I was.Why do I like it so much?! I mean, it does everything wrong, according to Creative Writing 101: it tells instead of shows, there's not a lot of concrete sensory imagery, and the language isn't fresh ("their eyes would sparkle"?). Much of the language is abstract and vague, very thinky, not very do-y. And ultimately (spoiler alert), not a lot happens in the narrative: basically, a guy goes on a date. (I'm curious to hear what my students, a bright lot, will say.)
But I'm hypnotized by the thing. It gives me the same kind of high that reading Kundera or Duras or Mercè Rodoreda gives me.
!Necesito Troncoso!
| Tweet | ||
![]()
Three Cool Things: Ethnic Studies
The University of Nebraska-Lincoln threw its annual Ethnic Studies Week this past week, and I managed to attend three very cool events. (There were way more, but the rest of life didn't, alas, slow down.)
#1
Nwando Achebe visited us from Michigan State to talk about the intersections of power, indigenous cultural practices, and gender politics in Igboland in Nigeria. Dr. Achebe is the author of Farmers, Traders, Warriors, and Kings: Female Power and Authority in Northern Igboland, 1900-1960 (and the daughter of world-famous writer Chinua Achebe--which I hesitate to include, because it must be tough to be always in the shadow of such a father, but it's too interesting a factoid to omit).
Vibrant, friendly, and endlessly knowledgeable about her field, Nwando centered her talk on the unusual historical figure of Ahebi Ugbabe, who was born in the late nineteenth century and died in 1948. As a 13-year-old girl, she was dedicated as a living sacrifice to the goddess Ohe to compensate for her father's crimes--but she refused to submit and instead ran away to a nearby region. She traveled, supported herself through sex work, and learned four languages. When the British first patrolled the area in 1909, Ahebi's linguistic mastery gave her political power to act as a negotiator within competing colonial and indigenous orders of power. She was young, beautiful, and dependable, and she worked to satisfy the sexual and colonial appetites of the British, helping them conquer her own people. (Her story kind of reminded me of the legendary Mexican figure of Malinche/Malintzin/Doña Marina--a woman horribly betrayed in childhood by her own people who, in making do, was later seen as a traitor to her culture.)
The British, to erode traditional power, which was elder-based and community-based, made young Nigerian men into "warrant chiefs," which were sort of the equivalent of local rulers, and they made Ahebi a warrant chief, too--the only woman in Nigeria to become one.
Ahebi wasn't content with this; she wanted to be an eze (sp.?), a king. Not a queen, mind you, not a woman who had power due to marriage, but a king in her own right. Long story short, she became one. Her palace served as a sanctuary for women who'd run away from abusive husbands, and Ahebi "married" them. Those women's children (from sexual relations with distinguished guests, both British and Nigerian) were considered her children, and they carried Ahebi's name. She opened a primary school, and she bought and kept slaves, who worked her fields and built roads at her command. About 20,000 people were under her rule.
When she tried to participate in the religious ritual of masquerade, however, the Igbo people drew the line. They'd had enough. According to traditional norms, to mount a masked figure (representing an ancestral spirit) in the masquerade required not only being biologically male but also having undergone an initiation. Ahebi fulfilled neither of these requirements, so an indigenous legal group ruled against her. Total smack down. And the British didn't back her up. Her fall from power was so extreme that she threw her own funeral while still alive, in order to be assured of receiving the proper rites and honor, because she so doubted that others would perform them after her death.
Her foray into power went only so far: she could function as a king, but when it came to religious power, no way.
Interesting story! And I learned about female marriage in Nigeria. Marriage and children are so culturally central that if a woman is infertile, she can marry another woman. That woman has sex with men (considered to be irrelevant sperm donors), who have no jurisdiction over the resulting offspring. The two women raise the children together. Curiously, it's not a lesbian thing: Dr. Achebe said that while gay sex sure occurs in the culture, it's not necessarily a component of such marriages, which focus on childrearing. Huh! Who knew?
#2
The second cool event was a talk by my UNL colleague in Anthropology, Carleen Sanchez, titled, "Songs of the Ancestors: Musical Instruments of the Ancient Maya." Carleen, who's an archaeologist (and also a good friend), reminded us that only material objects can be excavated; we can never recover the sounds of a culture or its belief system.
So how do we know what the music of the ancient Maya sounded like?
Particularly given that many musical instruments were made of organic material (wood, reed, antlers, turtle shells), they've degraded in the intervening centuries, so most of the evidence comes from extant murals and painted vases.
Carleen did this great presentation with images and sound files, and lucky for you, the article on which her talk was based exists online in the journal Istmo. It has links to all the images and sounds--you can get a total education on the topic.
My favorite instrument (I played this sound file for James like six times this morning) was the friction drum, which has a single strand of sinew strung vertically upward from a floor drum. You hold the strand of sinew taut, and then you scrape it with a rasp. It sounds like a jaguar, which was the most dangerous animal in the jungle in which the Mayan civilization flourished. (Wearing a jaguar skin meant you were super-powerful; only the elite got to.) Go to this cool site to hear it; go to LISTEN, then click on the larger square image with the line connecting to Guatemala. It's totally cool.
Carleen showed us images of musicians playing at state events like feasts, sacred ball games, burials, etc., but I was thinking about how the elite (to whom such instruments were apparently restricted; sigh) could have terrorized commoners with such a noise. (Have you ever been inside a Mayan earthwork? Dark and spooky. I was imagining walking along one of those pitch-black tunnels and suddenly hearing the friction-drum jaguar noise behind me. It would have been a great way to enforce power-over.) But all that was just my imagination running away with me. Carleen stuck to the knowable facts. If you have any interest in the music of the Mayans during the Classic Period (400-900 A.D.), check out her piece.
#3
Lastly, James and I went Saturday night to a free screening at The Ross of a new documentary, Native Nations: Standing Together for Civil Rights. Its focus was diffuse, but one story it illuminated was the strong presence of the Lutheran church in the activism for civil rights for Native Americans.
The documentary made the point that most of us are aware of the strong presence of the church in African-American civil rights struggles, but we're not as aware of the Lutheran church's contributions to the American Indian Movement, and one cool thing is that they pledged not to try to convert to Christianity any of the Native Americans they helped: they were giving their help because it was, they felt, the right moral and political thing to do, not to increase their own numbers.
It actually made me a little sad, though, because if I'm following the money correctly, the documentary seems to have been funded by the Lutherans. It lauds their contributions--but they were only involved with Indian rights for eighteen years, and then they dumped the cause. They also imposed extremely stringent requirements for the grants they doled out--more stringent than is typical even for business, the film suggested. And the grants were for $4500, max, when the poverty and needs of Native Americans were/are blatant and extreme. It felt to me like the film had to be nicer to the Lutherans than the Lutherans maybe deserved (and that there were more urgent stories that the writers were itching to tell). Still, the documentary told an interesting story, and it fills a gap in the historical record.
Two of the (Native American) producers, Syd Beane and Frank Blythe, were there at the Ross doing Q&A, and one thing I really liked is that, after decades of organizing and activist efforts, they took on the project after they retired. You would think that after all those years of labor and struggle, they might feel entitled to a nice long snooze in the sun. But instead of sitting around watching TV, they made TV. They got their own voices and the stories of their people out there into the world. (ABC picked it up, and the National Geographic channel might be looking at it soon.)
I thought that was a really beautiful thing in terms of love and work for the community. "Service is the rent we pay for living," as Marian Wright Edelman says, and living doesn't end the day we turn 65. As elders, Beane and Blythe are being great role models for the rest of us.
#1
Nwando Achebe visited us from Michigan State to talk about the intersections of power, indigenous cultural practices, and gender politics in Igboland in Nigeria. Dr. Achebe is the author of Farmers, Traders, Warriors, and Kings: Female Power and Authority in Northern Igboland, 1900-1960 (and the daughter of world-famous writer Chinua Achebe--which I hesitate to include, because it must be tough to be always in the shadow of such a father, but it's too interesting a factoid to omit).
Vibrant, friendly, and endlessly knowledgeable about her field, Nwando centered her talk on the unusual historical figure of Ahebi Ugbabe, who was born in the late nineteenth century and died in 1948. As a 13-year-old girl, she was dedicated as a living sacrifice to the goddess Ohe to compensate for her father's crimes--but she refused to submit and instead ran away to a nearby region. She traveled, supported herself through sex work, and learned four languages. When the British first patrolled the area in 1909, Ahebi's linguistic mastery gave her political power to act as a negotiator within competing colonial and indigenous orders of power. She was young, beautiful, and dependable, and she worked to satisfy the sexual and colonial appetites of the British, helping them conquer her own people. (Her story kind of reminded me of the legendary Mexican figure of Malinche/Malintzin/Doña Marina--a woman horribly betrayed in childhood by her own people who, in making do, was later seen as a traitor to her culture.)
The British, to erode traditional power, which was elder-based and community-based, made young Nigerian men into "warrant chiefs," which were sort of the equivalent of local rulers, and they made Ahebi a warrant chief, too--the only woman in Nigeria to become one.
Ahebi wasn't content with this; she wanted to be an eze (sp.?), a king. Not a queen, mind you, not a woman who had power due to marriage, but a king in her own right. Long story short, she became one. Her palace served as a sanctuary for women who'd run away from abusive husbands, and Ahebi "married" them. Those women's children (from sexual relations with distinguished guests, both British and Nigerian) were considered her children, and they carried Ahebi's name. She opened a primary school, and she bought and kept slaves, who worked her fields and built roads at her command. About 20,000 people were under her rule.
When she tried to participate in the religious ritual of masquerade, however, the Igbo people drew the line. They'd had enough. According to traditional norms, to mount a masked figure (representing an ancestral spirit) in the masquerade required not only being biologically male but also having undergone an initiation. Ahebi fulfilled neither of these requirements, so an indigenous legal group ruled against her. Total smack down. And the British didn't back her up. Her fall from power was so extreme that she threw her own funeral while still alive, in order to be assured of receiving the proper rites and honor, because she so doubted that others would perform them after her death.
Her foray into power went only so far: she could function as a king, but when it came to religious power, no way.
Interesting story! And I learned about female marriage in Nigeria. Marriage and children are so culturally central that if a woman is infertile, she can marry another woman. That woman has sex with men (considered to be irrelevant sperm donors), who have no jurisdiction over the resulting offspring. The two women raise the children together. Curiously, it's not a lesbian thing: Dr. Achebe said that while gay sex sure occurs in the culture, it's not necessarily a component of such marriages, which focus on childrearing. Huh! Who knew?
#2
The second cool event was a talk by my UNL colleague in Anthropology, Carleen Sanchez, titled, "Songs of the Ancestors: Musical Instruments of the Ancient Maya." Carleen, who's an archaeologist (and also a good friend), reminded us that only material objects can be excavated; we can never recover the sounds of a culture or its belief system.
So how do we know what the music of the ancient Maya sounded like?
Particularly given that many musical instruments were made of organic material (wood, reed, antlers, turtle shells), they've degraded in the intervening centuries, so most of the evidence comes from extant murals and painted vases.
Carleen did this great presentation with images and sound files, and lucky for you, the article on which her talk was based exists online in the journal Istmo. It has links to all the images and sounds--you can get a total education on the topic.
My favorite instrument (I played this sound file for James like six times this morning) was the friction drum, which has a single strand of sinew strung vertically upward from a floor drum. You hold the strand of sinew taut, and then you scrape it with a rasp. It sounds like a jaguar, which was the most dangerous animal in the jungle in which the Mayan civilization flourished. (Wearing a jaguar skin meant you were super-powerful; only the elite got to.) Go to this cool site to hear it; go to LISTEN, then click on the larger square image with the line connecting to Guatemala. It's totally cool.
Carleen showed us images of musicians playing at state events like feasts, sacred ball games, burials, etc., but I was thinking about how the elite (to whom such instruments were apparently restricted; sigh) could have terrorized commoners with such a noise. (Have you ever been inside a Mayan earthwork? Dark and spooky. I was imagining walking along one of those pitch-black tunnels and suddenly hearing the friction-drum jaguar noise behind me. It would have been a great way to enforce power-over.) But all that was just my imagination running away with me. Carleen stuck to the knowable facts. If you have any interest in the music of the Mayans during the Classic Period (400-900 A.D.), check out her piece.
#3
Lastly, James and I went Saturday night to a free screening at The Ross of a new documentary, Native Nations: Standing Together for Civil Rights. Its focus was diffuse, but one story it illuminated was the strong presence of the Lutheran church in the activism for civil rights for Native Americans.
The documentary made the point that most of us are aware of the strong presence of the church in African-American civil rights struggles, but we're not as aware of the Lutheran church's contributions to the American Indian Movement, and one cool thing is that they pledged not to try to convert to Christianity any of the Native Americans they helped: they were giving their help because it was, they felt, the right moral and political thing to do, not to increase their own numbers.
It actually made me a little sad, though, because if I'm following the money correctly, the documentary seems to have been funded by the Lutherans. It lauds their contributions--but they were only involved with Indian rights for eighteen years, and then they dumped the cause. They also imposed extremely stringent requirements for the grants they doled out--more stringent than is typical even for business, the film suggested. And the grants were for $4500, max, when the poverty and needs of Native Americans were/are blatant and extreme. It felt to me like the film had to be nicer to the Lutherans than the Lutherans maybe deserved (and that there were more urgent stories that the writers were itching to tell). Still, the documentary told an interesting story, and it fills a gap in the historical record.
Two of the (Native American) producers, Syd Beane and Frank Blythe, were there at the Ross doing Q&A, and one thing I really liked is that, after decades of organizing and activist efforts, they took on the project after they retired. You would think that after all those years of labor and struggle, they might feel entitled to a nice long snooze in the sun. But instead of sitting around watching TV, they made TV. They got their own voices and the stories of their people out there into the world. (ABC picked it up, and the National Geographic channel might be looking at it soon.)
I thought that was a really beautiful thing in terms of love and work for the community. "Service is the rent we pay for living," as Marian Wright Edelman says, and living doesn't end the day we turn 65. As elders, Beane and Blythe are being great role models for the rest of us.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
You Know You're Getting Older When . . .
. . . the only reason you want to see the new James Bond movie is Judi Dench.
Have a good weekend, folks!
Have a good weekend, folks!
| Tweet | ||
![]()
Do Women Exist? Feminicidios, Literature, and Erasure
You've probably heard about the Juárez murders. In the Mexican border town of Ciudad Juárez, over 400 young women have been abducted and killed since 1993. They are usually young and single, often overworked and underpaid employees of the maquiladoras (the foreign-owned factories in the city), and their often raped, often tortured, often mutilated bodies are found in the desert where they've been tossed.
The lack of police and governmental response has become an international scandal. The governor of the state of Chihuahua once suggested that the victims were probably prostitutes and then offered the blasé suggestion that women carry whistles and their car keys to protect themselves--clearly out of touch with the fact that the targeted women were financially unable to own cars. Most were between the ages of 12 and 22.
In protest, numerous activists, artists, and writers have responded, like the feminist collective Malaleche, like creative writers Alicia Gaspar de Alba with her novel Desert Blood: The Juárez Murders and poet Marjorie Agosín with Secrets in the Sand: The Young Women of Juárez, and journalists like Diana Washington Valdez with The Killing Fields: The Harvest of Women, Teresa Rodriguez with her book The Daughters of Juárez: A True Story of Serial Murder South of the Border, and Stephanie Elizondo Griest with a chapter of Mexican Enough.
You might remember Bordertown, the 2006 movie for which Jennifer Lopez was awarded the Artists for Amnesty prize at the Berlin Film Festival by Amnesty International--and for which director Gregory Nava received death threats during production in Juárez. Several documentaries have also been made about the murders, including Lourdes Portillo's Señorita Extraviada, Lorena Mendez's Border Echoes, and Alex Flores and Lorena Vassolo's Juárez.
Is it a coincidence that most of the work on the murders comes from Latinas? I'll go out on a limb here and say it's not.
The government and police have responded to international pressure and exposure, but the murders remain unsolved. The murders continue.
Turns out, deceased literary darling Roberto Bolaño, as we learn on the front page of today's New York Times Book Review, "s[a]nk the capital of his great book," an 898-page tome titled 2666, into the murdered Mexican girls and women as well.
Reviewer Jonathan Lethem, whose review of the novel is comparably long--it covers the front page, page 10, and page 11 and opens with a yawningly lengthy description of a Philip K. Dick story--praises Bolaño's weighty achievement. (We begin to hear about the book itself in the third column of page 10, if you decide to read the review and want to skip ahead.)
He praises the book effusively: it's a "master statement," a "supreme capstone" for Bolaño's "vaulting ambition." The review ends giddily: "Now throw your hats in the air."
Personally and generally speaking, I'm always a little skeptical when I see the word master used as a positive term, and I was sorry to see that Lethem sees the world as "increasingly, and terrifyingly, post-national," when I, a dreamy post-nationalist, find the concept of a future WU liberating, beautiful, and exciting, not threatening. (Okay, so it's utopian. So I can dream.)
But what struck me about the review were Lethem's literary touchstones. Bolaño, he claims,
Really?
At one point in the review, Lethem takes a moment to critique "our" (our?) "deplorably sporadic appetite for international writing," so I suppose Murakami et al. are his compensatory gestures on that score. (We also get a couple of nods to Giuseppe Arcimboldo, the painter who did those fruit-and-veggie faces.)
But I found myself wondering where the women were. Does Lethem read any? Which? Does none of them do anything stupendous enough to use as a point of comparison in an encomium? Does none of them "sound[ ] the moral depths" of "verifiable tragedy and injustice"?
It's weird to me that Bolaño anchors his 898-page novel (two dull rants by male characters of which Lethem quotes at breathlessly admiring length) with a fictionalized version of Ciudad Juárez. Bolaño's work is serious: it's about dead women.
And it's weird to me that Lethem doffs his hat to that dead-women seriousness while never tipping it to the women writers of our time (or any time).
The spatial privileging is weird to me, too: Lethem on Bolaño got the front page, folks, and he got a huge word count for his thoughts. Somebody decided that. Oh, the bigness.
After sharing my concerns with a friend about the way Lethem went about his review, I sighed and said, "Well, but I'm sure it's a great novel, though."
She drew me up short. "See, that's the difference," she said. "We say, 'I'm sure it's a great novel.' We give them the benefit of the doubt. But when a book by a woman of color comes out and it gets a lot of attention, do you think they say, 'Well, I'm sure it's a great book, though'?"
Or do they say, Well, we all know why she won that prize/received that award/got that position?
You know, I don't want to be cynical. But I read these creamy reviews of male authors or rhapsodic eulogies for male authors, and they feel like a boys' club. The culture-makers that write them rewrite a world, a context, in which no women writers or artists exist. When they look up at night, the constellations are all male.
And I start to wonder if the literary achievements of women--despite decades of feminist criticism and scads of ardent readers--aren't metaphorically just lying out there in the desert, waiting for someone besides us to care.
The lack of police and governmental response has become an international scandal. The governor of the state of Chihuahua once suggested that the victims were probably prostitutes and then offered the blasé suggestion that women carry whistles and their car keys to protect themselves--clearly out of touch with the fact that the targeted women were financially unable to own cars. Most were between the ages of 12 and 22.
In protest, numerous activists, artists, and writers have responded, like the feminist collective Malaleche, like creative writers Alicia Gaspar de Alba with her novel Desert Blood: The Juárez Murders and poet Marjorie Agosín with Secrets in the Sand: The Young Women of Juárez, and journalists like Diana Washington Valdez with The Killing Fields: The Harvest of Women, Teresa Rodriguez with her book The Daughters of Juárez: A True Story of Serial Murder South of the Border, and Stephanie Elizondo Griest with a chapter of Mexican Enough.
You might remember Bordertown, the 2006 movie for which Jennifer Lopez was awarded the Artists for Amnesty prize at the Berlin Film Festival by Amnesty International--and for which director Gregory Nava received death threats during production in Juárez. Several documentaries have also been made about the murders, including Lourdes Portillo's Señorita Extraviada, Lorena Mendez's Border Echoes, and Alex Flores and Lorena Vassolo's Juárez.
Is it a coincidence that most of the work on the murders comes from Latinas? I'll go out on a limb here and say it's not.
The government and police have responded to international pressure and exposure, but the murders remain unsolved. The murders continue.
Turns out, deceased literary darling Roberto Bolaño, as we learn on the front page of today's New York Times Book Review, "s[a]nk the capital of his great book," an 898-page tome titled 2666, into the murdered Mexican girls and women as well.
Reviewer Jonathan Lethem, whose review of the novel is comparably long--it covers the front page, page 10, and page 11 and opens with a yawningly lengthy description of a Philip K. Dick story--praises Bolaño's weighty achievement. (We begin to hear about the book itself in the third column of page 10, if you decide to read the review and want to skip ahead.)
He praises the book effusively: it's a "master statement," a "supreme capstone" for Bolaño's "vaulting ambition." The review ends giddily: "Now throw your hats in the air."
Personally and generally speaking, I'm always a little skeptical when I see the word master used as a positive term, and I was sorry to see that Lethem sees the world as "increasingly, and terrifyingly, post-national," when I, a dreamy post-nationalist, find the concept of a future WU liberating, beautiful, and exciting, not threatening. (Okay, so it's utopian. So I can dream.)
But what struck me about the review were Lethem's literary touchstones. Bolaño, he claims,
stand[s] in relation to the generation of García Márquez, Vargas Llosa and Fuentes as, say, David Foster Wallace does to Mailer, Updike, and Roth.Hmm. I started to get a familiar feeling. Lethem goes on. We get a "Lovecraftian shadow." We learn that Bolaño includes
digressive outbursts of lyricism as piercing as the disjunctions of Denis Johnson, David Goodis or, yes, Philip K. Dick, as well as the filmmaker David Lynch.The book is "[i]n the manner of James Ellroy," and contains "the greatest ranting monologue this side of Don DeLillo's Lenny Bruce routines in Underworld." Its "nearest comparison may be to Haruki Murakami's shattering fugue on Japanese military atrocities in Mongolia."
Really?
At one point in the review, Lethem takes a moment to critique "our" (our?) "deplorably sporadic appetite for international writing," so I suppose Murakami et al. are his compensatory gestures on that score. (We also get a couple of nods to Giuseppe Arcimboldo, the painter who did those fruit-and-veggie faces.)
But I found myself wondering where the women were. Does Lethem read any? Which? Does none of them do anything stupendous enough to use as a point of comparison in an encomium? Does none of them "sound[ ] the moral depths" of "verifiable tragedy and injustice"?
It's weird to me that Bolaño anchors his 898-page novel (two dull rants by male characters of which Lethem quotes at breathlessly admiring length) with a fictionalized version of Ciudad Juárez. Bolaño's work is serious: it's about dead women.
And it's weird to me that Lethem doffs his hat to that dead-women seriousness while never tipping it to the women writers of our time (or any time).
The spatial privileging is weird to me, too: Lethem on Bolaño got the front page, folks, and he got a huge word count for his thoughts. Somebody decided that. Oh, the bigness.
After sharing my concerns with a friend about the way Lethem went about his review, I sighed and said, "Well, but I'm sure it's a great novel, though."
She drew me up short. "See, that's the difference," she said. "We say, 'I'm sure it's a great novel.' We give them the benefit of the doubt. But when a book by a woman of color comes out and it gets a lot of attention, do you think they say, 'Well, I'm sure it's a great book, though'?"
Or do they say, Well, we all know why she won that prize/received that award/got that position?
You know, I don't want to be cynical. But I read these creamy reviews of male authors or rhapsodic eulogies for male authors, and they feel like a boys' club. The culture-makers that write them rewrite a world, a context, in which no women writers or artists exist. When they look up at night, the constellations are all male.
And I start to wonder if the literary achievements of women--despite decades of feminist criticism and scads of ardent readers--aren't metaphorically just lying out there in the desert, waiting for someone besides us to care.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Euphoria, Relief, Laughter
Woohoo! Now that it's all over, now that the world is exhaling and Sasha and Malia are going to get their First Puppy, it's great to be able to able to relax and laugh at myself, to laugh at all of us who've been so passionate and devoted for so long now. We won!
As the election was called last night and the talking heads waxed ecstatic, I couldn't help noticing that the rhetorical focus was all on the breaking of the racial barrier. This was great, amazing, fantastic--and so dramatic. Of course it was central in the commentary.
But gradually I began to feel a lack. What about Obama's policies? What about the clear vote of the American people for peace, the environment, fiscal responsibility, economic justice? Maybe the commentators considered all that a given; I don't know. The Onion cracked me up by putting all the "historic moment" talk into grim perspective in the column, "Nation Finally Shitty Enough to Make Social Progress."
Lastly, I was struck last night, as I sat with friends watching John McCain's concession speech and Obama's victory speech, by the different tenors of the crowds. The McCain folks booed repeatedly when McCain mentioned Obama, even after he motioned them to stop, while the Grant Park crowd clapped politely (if perhaps a smidge unenthusiastically) when Obama mentioned McCain. It made me think about civility, about behaving with grace and generosity, whichever side you're on. (Granted, it's easier to be genteel when you've just trounced your opponent.)
But I got a whole new perspective on it when I read Tayari's Twitter this morning. On talk radio in Ghana, it's being said that "John McCain has taught the world how to lose," i.e., "No rioting."
Huh. I guess so! That sure put things in another perspective. It made me feel good about it after all. What are a few angry yells? Let 'em vent.
As the election was called last night and the talking heads waxed ecstatic, I couldn't help noticing that the rhetorical focus was all on the breaking of the racial barrier. This was great, amazing, fantastic--and so dramatic. Of course it was central in the commentary.
But gradually I began to feel a lack. What about Obama's policies? What about the clear vote of the American people for peace, the environment, fiscal responsibility, economic justice? Maybe the commentators considered all that a given; I don't know. The Onion cracked me up by putting all the "historic moment" talk into grim perspective in the column, "Nation Finally Shitty Enough to Make Social Progress."
Lastly, I was struck last night, as I sat with friends watching John McCain's concession speech and Obama's victory speech, by the different tenors of the crowds. The McCain folks booed repeatedly when McCain mentioned Obama, even after he motioned them to stop, while the Grant Park crowd clapped politely (if perhaps a smidge unenthusiastically) when Obama mentioned McCain. It made me think about civility, about behaving with grace and generosity, whichever side you're on. (Granted, it's easier to be genteel when you've just trounced your opponent.)
But I got a whole new perspective on it when I read Tayari's Twitter this morning. On talk radio in Ghana, it's being said that "John McCain has taught the world how to lose," i.e., "No rioting."
Huh. I guess so! That sure put things in another perspective. It made me feel good about it after all. What are a few angry yells? Let 'em vent.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
All Around the World, It's a Love Thing
In Ghana, where friend-of-the-blog Tayari Jones is currently sojourning as a keynote speaker at the Pan African Writers' Association’s 16th International African Writers’ Day Celebrations in Accra, a pop-tune smash is devoted to our U.S. presidential candidate: "I got a crush on Obama. In 2008, Baby you're the best candidate!" Obama merchandise--t-shirts, hats, buttons--is the merchandise people want there, and the conference is going to include a big election-watching party and celebration breakfast from midnight (due to the time difference) to dawn, because people there are so engaged with the outcome of this election that they want to be up all night to see it happen. Tayari was introduced as the "Lady from the Land of Obama."
So it's not only Berlin and France and the European world that are excited about our brilliant, calm, big-thinking, forward-looking young candidate. This is global.
James and I just got back from voting. We were lucky; the line at our downtown polling place was only about ten minutes long. A very enthusiastic young guy (were his eyes flashing Obama! Obama!--or was I beginning to hallucinate?) explained the ballots, and bing-bang-boom, we were done and heading down the street to get our free I-voted cups of coffee from Starbucks. We held hands all the way (who knew voting could be romantic?), and at one corner, I actually found myself bouncing while waiting for the light to turn green.
I am so nervous that something will go awry, but I'm also excited. I think we're going to do it this time. Tengo fe.
So it's not only Berlin and France and the European world that are excited about our brilliant, calm, big-thinking, forward-looking young candidate. This is global.
James and I just got back from voting. We were lucky; the line at our downtown polling place was only about ten minutes long. A very enthusiastic young guy (were his eyes flashing Obama! Obama!--or was I beginning to hallucinate?) explained the ballots, and bing-bang-boom, we were done and heading down the street to get our free I-voted cups of coffee from Starbucks. We held hands all the way (who knew voting could be romantic?), and at one corner, I actually found myself bouncing while waiting for the light to turn green.
I am so nervous that something will go awry, but I'm also excited. I think we're going to do it this time. Tengo fe.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Report from the Front Lines of the Obama Campaign
My aunt Barb, who lives in San Francisco, has been working full-time for the last month in Ohio as an Obama volunteer. On this day before the election, I thought it might be interesting to invite her to be our guest-blogger about what it's been like there, on the ground, on the front lines.
If Obama and Biden win, it will be because of the volunteer efforts of people like Barb, people who've devoted time and enthusiasm all across the United States. Even if you're just driving a friend to the polling place tomorrow, even if you've just written a single letter to the editor of your local paper, you've helped the effort to make the United States a better, fairer place.
I'm so proud of my aunt--proud of her passion, her activism, her guts--and I'm grateful to everyone like her who's worked so hard. So here she is, in her own voice:
If Obama and Biden win, it will be because of the volunteer efforts of people like Barb, people who've devoted time and enthusiasm all across the United States. Even if you're just driving a friend to the polling place tomorrow, even if you've just written a single letter to the editor of your local paper, you've helped the effort to make the United States a better, fairer place.
I'm so proud of my aunt--proud of her passion, her activism, her guts--and I'm grateful to everyone like her who's worked so hard. So here she is, in her own voice:
First, as background, I took four weeks' vacation to come here to work the campaign for the AFL-CIO. I am a union thug…and damn proud of it. I believe in collective bargaining and that the worker of America has an inalienable right to share in the fruits of her labor with the employer. I don’t think the boss deserves to make 450 times what the average employee makes…and I’m a socialist at heart. However, I want everyone brought up to my level, or better yet, to the level or two above me…not for me and mine to lose one dime. So I’m not a very good socialist, I guess…
I have worked the last several elections, and every single one has been ‘the most important one of our lives.’ I’m not a cat…so I know I don’t have 9 lives. It’s exhausting and tiresome to hear that over and over. Almost as bad as seeing those horrible ads that the McCain campaign is putting on the air here in Ohio. But it’s really true this time. We must reclaim America.
I worked the Kerry campaign in Denver. It was a magnificent experience until the last day…when we realized we were fucked. I cried for about 24 hours. But talking to people there was different because it was never about race.
What saddens me for America this time is that it IS about race. There is no fooling me. I’ve been to this rodeo before and if Barack Obama was a white man named Barry O’Hara, McCain wouldn’t even be a glimmer. There wouldn’t be a thinking man or woman in America who wouldn’t see that he is absolutely the right person for the job. Certainly there would be no WORKING man or woman in America who wouldn’t see it… and when I say ‘working’ I mean all of us who draw a paycheck, not a dividend check or some kind of trust check…but a pay check, regardless of how much it is. If you draw a paycheck, you should by definition be a Democrat.
One woman told me that she couldn’t vote for him because they can’t even verify his birth certificate, so how do we know that he was born here. Apparently the fact that his mother’s citizenship transferred to him didn’t occur to her. And apparently the fact that McCain was born in Panama matters not.
Another, at the door of her modest home, said to me, "I'm not prejudiced but...well, YOU know what I mean... we can't just elect him, can we?" Who did she think "we" were? Did she not see the big letters across my shirt that said OBAMA BIDEN?? Did she not see the buttons all over me?
And there was the time I knocked on a door and a very nice African American man answered the door and told me he hadn't made up his mind yet. WHAT????? But I came to understand. He needed to know more. It was just as insulting for me to expect him to vote for Obama because they were both black men as it is to expect me to vote for Palin because we both have a set of tits. Although I think mine are better.
And religious freedom is good for everyone but Muslims here. Did you know that? I was shocked to find out that religious freedom only applies to Christians.
There is a part of Ohio (maybe more than one) that is so backward, so hateful, I could hear them thinking, I’m not voting for that n--. After about 2 weeks here, I was given ‘permission’ by my national union president to call them on the racism. To ask them point blank, "So you’re not voting for him because he’s black, isn’t that right?" Note: good way to end a conversation. They hang up when you say that to them.
So would I recommend coming to Ohio? No. Unless you are a glutton for punishment or you want really, really bad pizza. (Another blog…but trust me).
So having said that…let me tell you the other stuff….
There is such hope, such passion here at the thought of this historic election (another phrase that is wearing thin). There are people of every race, every economic status, every age bracket… both genders… coming together. I am working side by side with soccer moms and hockey moms (with or without lipstick) and steel workers, letter carriers and plumbers (by the way...'Joe the Plumber' isn't. He doesn't have a state license to practice the trade...nice, eh? and someone said he's not even registered to vote) who are working side by side with poor black women from the poorest neighborhoods, Latinos from Texas who know they can 't change Texas but might have an impact here…and we’re working for one cause.
And it’s exhilarating. It’s fascinating to drive through neighborhoods where homes are WAY out of our price ranges, and see Obama signs all over their yards. It’s hopeful…it’s full of hope.
There are lines to vote. Hours... they are waiting for hours to vote in this election. While driving to neighborhoods to knock on doors, we drove past a polling place were there were people with huge cookers and coolers full of food and drink for those waiting to vote. I am in awe of how important and how brave these people are.
While I sat in the Canton Civic Center auditorium waiting for Senator Obama (2 hours in line...2 hours in the auditorium...but so worth it), we started talking to those around us. There was a lovely woman in front of me who I guessed to be a few years older than me. We had nice, light conversation, and then for some reason she turned to me and said, "On my next birthday, I will be 70. I marched with King. I was hosed by the police with King. The dogs were set loose on me with King. And he told us to hope. That when the hate went away, anyone could be elected president, regardless of race. He gave us hope." It was more moving than anything I've ever heard. When Senator Obama came out, she stood and shook... cried for happiness....bowed her head and prayed.
It gave me hope.
It makes me proud to be here…proud to be working for this historic campaign. Proud to be an American who believes that all religions are free here…and in fact we’re free to not have any at all. It makes me feel safe to know that a man who is smart enough to know what he doesn’t know will be the next President.
What am I most afraid of? That he won’t win and what that means for us. What it means for the war and all those young people who are there, or who will go there, or will go BACK there…and for this nation.
I believe that if they steal this election like they have the last 2, that the hope and the passion will turn to anger and hatred, and it will be the downfall of our nation. We cannot survive that. I believe we will erupt into riots.
And if that happens…I will be in the streets. I will fight this. Or I will leave.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Latina Writers on the Vote
Forty percent of Florida Cubans favor Obama? ¡Hijole! Never thought I'd see the day. That is one conservative bunch of voters down there. I guess even the folks with their yachts pointed toward Havana can see the way the wind's blowing.
Given that the President makes decisions that affect the arts, why is it important that Latino writers—as members of the largest minority in the U.S. and as members of the artistic community—vote on November 4th?
That's the question Marcela Landres asked several Latina and Latino writers recently. Here are two of my favorite answers.
The first is by Stephanie Elizondo Griest, whose book Mexican Enough we recently read in our English-Ethnic Studies Chicana/Chicano Literature class and who's been hailed on this blog before here and here. She responds:
Here's Marcela Landres's own view. If you like it, check out her website. The daughter of Ecuadorian immigrants who grew up in the projects in New York, she used to be an editor for Simon & Schuster. Now she works one-on-one with writers who are trying to get published. She publishes a helpful e-newsletter, Latinidad, which is the source of these comments.
Here's her lovely micro-essay, which I'll share with you in full:
Given that the President makes decisions that affect the arts, why is it important that Latino writers—as members of the largest minority in the U.S. and as members of the artistic community—vote on November 4th?
That's the question Marcela Landres asked several Latina and Latino writers recently. Here are two of my favorite answers.
The first is by Stephanie Elizondo Griest, whose book Mexican Enough we recently read in our English-Ethnic Studies Chicana/Chicano Literature class and who's been hailed on this blog before here and here. She responds:
As a travel writer, I live on the road, so have seen firsthand how the Bush Administration has devastated our standing in the international community. On November 4th, we have a precious opportunity to reverse the terrifying direction our nation has taken. And that is by casting our ballots for Barack Obama. He is beloved throughout the globe: Kenya, Indonesia, Cuba, Venezuela, Jordan, Germany--even France. He alone has the potential to restore people's faith in us. We must vote for him not just as writers or Latinos but as citizens of the world.The second is from Esmeralda Santiago, the author of the beautiful memoir When I Was Puerto Rican and other books, who dares to be a little intellectually and culturally elitist during a moment when that's a bad word:
This election demonstrates that our government officials and wannabes want us and the world to believe that a typical American is ‘Joe Six Pack’, ‘Joe the Plumber’, and ‘Soccer Mom.’ These stereotypes are meant to counter the terror-induced image of Americans as intellectual, high minded, eloquent. These [L]uddites don't openly say that Joe Six Pack, Joe the Plumber and Soccer Moms don't read, don't go to museums, don't think too much or too deeply about anything beyond the basic necessities. That might be offensive. But they loudly proclaim that the ‘average American’ prefers to drink reality into oblivion through liquor, are obsessed with sewage, and prefer to stand on the sidelines while someone else runs after the ball. It is up to intellectuals and artists to proudly and loudly elevate the discourse and to ennoble and dignify what it means to be an average or typical American. These are not issues of ethnicity or race. They are issues of citizenship.I had to smile: her tone ("obsessed with sewage") reminds me so much of my friend Corinne--who is, in fact, French, and who gave up on the United States and academia and went home to France, where she tells me there are decent cheeses, healthcare, and vacation time to be had.
Here's Marcela Landres's own view. If you like it, check out her website. The daughter of Ecuadorian immigrants who grew up in the projects in New York, she used to be an editor for Simon & Schuster. Now she works one-on-one with writers who are trying to get published. She publishes a helpful e-newsletter, Latinidad, which is the source of these comments.
Here's her lovely micro-essay, which I'll share with you in full:
Unless you are a political writer, you probably don't consciously think about politics when you write. Yet, the government wields enormous influence over your writing life. Politicians decide how much (or how little) money to allocate towards the arts, libraries, and schools. If art funding is cut, how many non-profit presses and literary journals will disappear? If library budgets decrease, how many of the remaining dollars will be spent on Latino books? If educational resources dwindle, how much time and attention will be devoted to creative writing classes?Here's hoping that as readers, writers, artists, and human beings, we all have a lot to celebrate Tuesday night! If you need some ginning up, check out this cool short Grey sent.
Voting is not only a political act; it is a creative one. With your pen or keyboard, you shape future generations of readers and writers, but voting is how you shape your future. You create your art by writing, and you create your country by voting.
On November 4th, put down your pens, walk away from your keyboards, and vote. Don't vote alone. Grab your abuelita, best friend, significant other, boss, staff, preacher, congregation, teacher, class, mentors, and protégées and make sure they vote too. On this election, it is not sufficient for individuals to vote—we must vote as a community.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()


