December 2008 Archives
A Working Holiday at Home
Happy Post-Holidays! Here in the little apartment, the presents are opened, the tree looks wan, James's lasagna was so knockout he won't even tell me what the secret sauce contained, and our sweet son Grey is here until Saturday morning.
Holidays are wonderful for a writer, especially when you're not traveling or hosting scads of people. I've finished Orhan Pamuk's My Name Is Red, two of Auster's three novellas in The New York Trilogy, and The Essential Yoga Sutra. (My formidable and timely challenge for the holiday season is asteya, no coveting.) I've loved having the mornings to write every day; I seem to be writing poems and essays. One new draft essay begins:
I don't mind the centerfold itself; it's amusing, actually, and he struck a witty pose, and the fact that he brought it home to share with us speaks to a sweet candor he's somehow decided to maintain. The centerfold just happened to make a handy jumping-off place for some thoughts about parent-child differences. Love and the grit of irritation. It goes on for pages and pages; I don't know yet where it will end up.
He's out and about in Lincoln just now, and I'm here in the apartment working. This week, I've got to finalize a syllabus for a new course I'm teaching this spring. It's a brand-new course for both me and UNL, Ethnic Studies 202: Intro to U.S. Latina/o Studies. I'm excited about it but feeling a little rushed with the details, especially since my expertise is only within literature, and this course branches out into other fields.
We're using this crazy, witty, irreverent graphic-format text, Latino USA: A Cartoon History (especially helpful, I hope, for visual learners) by Ilan Stavans and Lalo Alcaraz, to nail down the big, basic outlines of Latino history, which we'll then nuance with short readings like chapters 7 and 12 of Ronald Takaki's great A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America, Sonia Hernández's essay, “The Legacy of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on Tejanos’ Land” from the Journal of Popular Culture, Guillermo J. Grenier's essay, “The Creation and Maintenance of the Cuban American Exile Ideology,” from the Journal of American Ethnic History, and short readings on Puerto Rican and Dominican history.
We'll use Latino Boom, a really excellent anthology I've already road-tested, to read poetry, stories, essays, and plays by Latino writers, and I think we'll watch a couple of movies; I'm still deciding which. I'm really hoping that students from all different disciplines will find points of entry that are relevant and exciting to them--that economics majors will end up writing their final papers about--I don't know--the effect of migrant remittances on low-income Latino households in the Caribbean basin, and that poli sci majors will interrogate the effectiveness of building the wall.
Here are some of the other cool texts we're reading:
If you've been following the news stories about the publishing industry's hastening demise, you might be interested in this piece from yesterday's New York Times. David Streitfeld's "Bargain Hunting, and Feeling Sheepish About It" looks at the newly common practice of buying books at extremely low prices online. In one example, Streitfeld buys a book online for a quarter:
A world without bookstores. Ugh. Authors don't make a great deal of money anyway per book sold, from what I can tell. Full and indiscreet disclosure: The Truth Book, which sells in hardcover for an alarming $25, nets me about a buck a copy, and I've managed to publish a grand total of one book in my life. So I don't write for money, and I don't think most authors do (although that could be naive--I certainly know authors who talk a lot about money). And while I believe that artists should be compensated like any other laborer, it's not news that it's not a perfect world.
And so we write out of love, and to reach readers.
For a writer, it's sad to think of a world where readers couldn't browse through a bookstore, stumble across the spine of your book, and pick it up, a new and serendipitous discovery.
I *have* been thinking, though, about the great relief it is to have a blog, an Internet presence. If Mitchell-my-agent, though stellar, can't find a home for either my novel-in-progress or my short story collection (which has, in publishing, kind of the status of a hanger-on sort of relative, since collections don't sell) in this dismal fiscal crisis, I can always publish the novel serially on here. Why not? A far, far better thing it is to have 200 enthusiastic readers getting one's book for free than to have no readers at all.
That sort of electronic access to the world is a strange, wild freedom for writers, akin to having a press in one's living room. Like Leonard and Virginia at Hogarth House on Paradise Road. (Paradise Road!)
Impending demise or not, we're very lucky.
Holidays are wonderful for a writer, especially when you're not traveling or hosting scads of people. I've finished Orhan Pamuk's My Name Is Red, two of Auster's three novellas in The New York Trilogy, and The Essential Yoga Sutra. (My formidable and timely challenge for the holiday season is asteya, no coveting.) I've loved having the mornings to write every day; I seem to be writing poems and essays. One new draft essay begins:
My son stands nude in boots in the snow.It's about, if you can't guess, clashing class assumptions and generational tensions within one very small nuclear family. Grey's a swell kid; I wouldn't trade him. But some aspects of one's blithe, carefree children can be rather hard to take when the purchase price of their privilege has come very dear. Sometimes when he visits--and you've got to understand that the three of us are sharing 600 square feet of living space for two weeks, as we did all summer--my craw feels a bit stretched and poked.
My son, twenty, stands nude in boots in the snow.
My son, twenty, stands nude in boots in the snow, a closed black umbrella held vertically over those parts that, shown, would make him a centerfold in the traditional sense of the word, rather than a centerfold in the alternative student newspaper of Oberlin College, where he goes.
He has brought copies; it is Christmas; he is home.
I don't mind the centerfold itself; it's amusing, actually, and he struck a witty pose, and the fact that he brought it home to share with us speaks to a sweet candor he's somehow decided to maintain. The centerfold just happened to make a handy jumping-off place for some thoughts about parent-child differences. Love and the grit of irritation. It goes on for pages and pages; I don't know yet where it will end up.
He's out and about in Lincoln just now, and I'm here in the apartment working. This week, I've got to finalize a syllabus for a new course I'm teaching this spring. It's a brand-new course for both me and UNL, Ethnic Studies 202: Intro to U.S. Latina/o Studies. I'm excited about it but feeling a little rushed with the details, especially since my expertise is only within literature, and this course branches out into other fields.
We're using this crazy, witty, irreverent graphic-format text, Latino USA: A Cartoon History (especially helpful, I hope, for visual learners) by Ilan Stavans and Lalo Alcaraz, to nail down the big, basic outlines of Latino history, which we'll then nuance with short readings like chapters 7 and 12 of Ronald Takaki's great A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America, Sonia Hernández's essay, “The Legacy of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo on Tejanos’ Land” from the Journal of Popular Culture, Guillermo J. Grenier's essay, “The Creation and Maintenance of the Cuban American Exile Ideology,” from the Journal of American Ethnic History, and short readings on Puerto Rican and Dominican history.
We'll use Latino Boom, a really excellent anthology I've already road-tested, to read poetry, stories, essays, and plays by Latino writers, and I think we'll watch a couple of movies; I'm still deciding which. I'm really hoping that students from all different disciplines will find points of entry that are relevant and exciting to them--that economics majors will end up writing their final papers about--I don't know--the effect of migrant remittances on low-income Latino households in the Caribbean basin, and that poli sci majors will interrogate the effectiveness of building the wall.
Here are some of the other cool texts we're reading:
Suzanne Oboler, "The Politics of Labeling: Latino/a Cultural Identities of Self and Others," from the journalI'm excited about it all, but it's a lot to juggle and then smoosh into fifteen weeks or so. We'll see. This year, UNL has me designing and teaching three brand-new preps, so it's a challenge. When I was a new junior professor, that kind of hectic course-development pace was standard. Now I kind of want to rotate, coast a bit, rest on my laurels--but nooooo. Oh, well. Here's hoping it keeps me spry.
Latin American Perspectives
Lourdes Torres, “Boricua Lesbians: Sexuality, Nationality, and the Politics of Passing,” from Centro
María Elena Cepeda, “Mucho Loco for Ricky Martin; or The Politics of Chronology, Crossover, and Language
Within the Latin(o) Music Boom,” from Popular Music & Society
chapter 5, "How to Tame a Wild Tongue" (which, of course, advocates nothing of the sort) of the inimitable
Gloria Anzaldúa's Borderlands/La Frontera: The New Mestiza --a book that blew me away and changed my
life in graduate school, and if you haven't read it, you must.
If you've been following the news stories about the publishing industry's hastening demise, you might be interested in this piece from yesterday's New York Times. David Streitfeld's "Bargain Hunting, and Feeling Sheepish About It" looks at the newly common practice of buying books at extremely low prices online. In one example, Streitfeld buys a book online for a quarter:
Neither my local bookstore nor [the publisher] Pantheon--whose parent, Random House, announced this month it would cut costs by reducing five divisions to three--nor the author got a share. The book looked good as new.It's so strange to me. I like bookstores. I like shopping in them. I like browsing through things I'd never have encountered otherwise. I don't love paying $14 for a paperback, but it has always seemed worthwhile, especially when you think about the other things that money gets spent on. Streitfeld connects the widespread and growing books-for-pennies-online habit to the closing down of not only independent bookstores across the country but also chain stores like Barnes & Noble.
A world without bookstores. Ugh. Authors don't make a great deal of money anyway per book sold, from what I can tell. Full and indiscreet disclosure: The Truth Book, which sells in hardcover for an alarming $25, nets me about a buck a copy, and I've managed to publish a grand total of one book in my life. So I don't write for money, and I don't think most authors do (although that could be naive--I certainly know authors who talk a lot about money). And while I believe that artists should be compensated like any other laborer, it's not news that it's not a perfect world.
And so we write out of love, and to reach readers.
For a writer, it's sad to think of a world where readers couldn't browse through a bookstore, stumble across the spine of your book, and pick it up, a new and serendipitous discovery.
I *have* been thinking, though, about the great relief it is to have a blog, an Internet presence. If Mitchell-my-agent, though stellar, can't find a home for either my novel-in-progress or my short story collection (which has, in publishing, kind of the status of a hanger-on sort of relative, since collections don't sell) in this dismal fiscal crisis, I can always publish the novel serially on here. Why not? A far, far better thing it is to have 200 enthusiastic readers getting one's book for free than to have no readers at all.
That sort of electronic access to the world is a strange, wild freedom for writers, akin to having a press in one's living room. Like Leonard and Virginia at Hogarth House on Paradise Road. (Paradise Road!)
Impending demise or not, we're very lucky.
| Tweet | ||
![]()
Happy Holidays to All the High-Functioning F**k-Ups
So James and I crunched down the hill into the Haymarket last night, past the light-and-greenery-wrapped lampposts in the snow like something out of It's a Wonderful Life, to the open house at Indigo Bridge Books, which was lovely. Owner Kim Coleman was there welcoming everyone, hugging kids and making sure people found what they sought. The counter was full of cinnamon rolls, coffee, and apple juice. Folks were playing the piano and singing, and it was great: a warm, cozy beacon of books and light on a frigid December night.
I toddled over to the thriller aisle, because--hurray!--my marvelous agent Mitchell had just sent me más páginas from my novel manuscript (an attempt at a hybrid chica-lit literary thriller) with his wonderfully cogent notes scrawled in the margins. May I just say this for the record? I love my agent. He's so smart and has such a great ear. And luckily, he seems to love this book--or, at least, this book's potential.
Alas, he finds it, as a would-be literary thriller, not quite thrilling enough. I've got the literary part down, he says, but I'm weak on thrills. (Which makes utter sense. As a professor, my big thrills now are things like a particularly good day of class discussion--woohoo!--or a tasty dinner out. But that's exactly the quiet way I like it. Anyway, Mitchell suggested that I read a couple of thrillers, just to remember what actual suspense is like, rather than my usual fare of micro-drama, e.g., Will my problem student show up for the final?)
(Btw: No.)
So there I was in the thriller aisle, picking up these short, fat, mass-market paperbacks, reading the first two paragraphs, and putting them back down. Thrills they may have contained--I'll take it on blurb-faith--but the writing was driving me nuts. Sometimes I can tolerate crap writing (I've devoured Patricia Cornwell novels like the next masochist, sure), but last night I just couldn't.
And I'd already read all of Dennis Lehane's smoothly written Patrick Kenzie novels and all of Joanne Dobson's hilarious, working-class-girl-turned-academic-at-a-
private-liberal-arts-college Karen Pelletier mysteries--which I heartily recommend to all my fellow repressed academic women out there, but which might actually be part of my Mitchell-identified problem. Booklist's starred review, after all, says, "Few are better than Dobson at recording the minutiae of academic committee-speak, powerplays in . . . jargon, and what ignites a classroom." Ooooh. Talk about thrills. LOL. So what was I to do?
Luckily, I lit on two books: Orhan Pamuk's My Name is Red, and Paul Auster's The New York Trilogy, which includes the novella-length City of Glass, Ghosts, and The Locked Room. And they're both great, and I can't put either one down, so I'm going to have to read them in tandem. I am apparently the last person on the planet to have not read Paul Auster, but if you're among my woeful kind, a caveat: Auster's City of Glass gets off to a slow and annoying start (my two-paragraph test nearly had it back on the shelf), but it picks up speed quickly, and then his sentences begin snapping so crisply into place. And then the surprises start coming.
Pamuk's novel, set in sixteenth-century Istanbul, hits the ground running with an opening chapter engagingly titled "I Am A Corpse":
And lest you think the novel lacks for experimental high jinks, you should know that the third chapter, "I Am A Dog," is narrated, not by a dog--no, that would be far too easy--but rather by "the figure of a dog drawn on rough paper hastily but with a certain elegance." Just fyi.
None of which, however, gets me any closer to the title of this blog-post. So.
Yesterday, at lunch with my writers' group, talk turned to the feeling of being a fuck-up, which none of us--tenured professors all, and with lovely fat vitas, etc.--has been entirely able to shake.
Then this morning, I read an interview with a homeless man in Madrid, whose friend had died in his arms of the cold. I was startled to read about his background. Fermín said,
But I think there are lots of troubled people who manage to function--and function well: to be good parents, to be socially generous and professionally competent. I know a lot of people like that, and you probably do, too.
I thought about how I still fight doubt and anxiety, and how my writer-friends at lunch came from backgrounds of painful difficulty. We're high-functioning, yes. We're relatively solvent; we're overachievers; we give back. But we still feel like fuck-ups. When the phrase "high-functioning fuck-ups" was uttered, we all laughed in recognition.
I don't need to add that the holidays, when your family is split or dead or hostile, are just that much harder. I dreamed last night my Dad was alive, and we were moving to South Carolina to live with my Aunt Lou (who doesn't actually live there), and there were palm trees and bright water like the Key West of my childhood, and she was still married to Uncle Gerry, and all the cousins were there, and we all played softball together, laughing, on a green green lawn.
Then I woke up.
At the holidays, secret weeping's entirely acceptable.
We are built to be loved and cherished. When that goes wrong, we're damaged.
Yet we are optimistic. And we are multitude. We work hard. We love our friends and our family. We go out and celebrate at little indie bookstores. We wrap presents and send our hearts out across the country to the people we miss. We forgive the shit that happened to us, and we try to change. Then we get up and do it again. We persist. We search. And we are knocked out by our gratitude just to be here, just to have this beautiful chance.
So to all of you high-functioning fuck-ups out there who hurt like hell yet still get up to wash your face every morning, I'm wishing you the very happiest of holidays. You deserve it. You've come so far. To annoy you with Hemingway's words: you're strong at the broken places--even when you feel weak and miserable there. You persist. You search. You're broken and gorgeous and kind.
And you're the folks who make the world go 'round, the folks I love the most. So take care. Stay warm.

I toddled over to the thriller aisle, because--hurray!--my marvelous agent Mitchell had just sent me más páginas from my novel manuscript (an attempt at a hybrid chica-lit literary thriller) with his wonderfully cogent notes scrawled in the margins. May I just say this for the record? I love my agent. He's so smart and has such a great ear. And luckily, he seems to love this book--or, at least, this book's potential.
Alas, he finds it, as a would-be literary thriller, not quite thrilling enough. I've got the literary part down, he says, but I'm weak on thrills. (Which makes utter sense. As a professor, my big thrills now are things like a particularly good day of class discussion--woohoo!--or a tasty dinner out. But that's exactly the quiet way I like it. Anyway, Mitchell suggested that I read a couple of thrillers, just to remember what actual suspense is like, rather than my usual fare of micro-drama, e.g., Will my problem student show up for the final?)
(Btw: No.)
So there I was in the thriller aisle, picking up these short, fat, mass-market paperbacks, reading the first two paragraphs, and putting them back down. Thrills they may have contained--I'll take it on blurb-faith--but the writing was driving me nuts. Sometimes I can tolerate crap writing (I've devoured Patricia Cornwell novels like the next masochist, sure), but last night I just couldn't.
And I'd already read all of Dennis Lehane's smoothly written Patrick Kenzie novels and all of Joanne Dobson's hilarious, working-class-girl-turned-academic-at-a-
private-liberal-arts-college Karen Pelletier mysteries--which I heartily recommend to all my fellow repressed academic women out there, but which might actually be part of my Mitchell-identified problem. Booklist's starred review, after all, says, "Few are better than Dobson at recording the minutiae of academic committee-speak, powerplays in . . . jargon, and what ignites a classroom." Ooooh. Talk about thrills. LOL. So what was I to do?
Pamuk's novel, set in sixteenth-century Istanbul, hits the ground running with an opening chapter engagingly titled "I Am A Corpse":
Ahh: no composition classrooms here. As I fell, my head, which he'd smashed with a stone, broke apart. Much more like it.I am nothing but a corpse now, a body at the bottom of a well. Though I drew my last breath long ago and my heart has stopped beating, no one, apart from that vile murderer, knows what's happened to me. As for that wretch, he felt for my pulse and listened for my breath to be sure I was dead, then kicked me in the midriff, carried me to the edge of the well, raised me up and dropped me below. As I fell, my head, which he'd smashed with a stone, broke apart; my face, my forehead and cheeks, were crushed; my bones shattered, and my mouth filled with blood.
And lest you think the novel lacks for experimental high jinks, you should know that the third chapter, "I Am A Dog," is narrated, not by a dog--no, that would be far too easy--but rather by "the figure of a dog drawn on rough paper hastily but with a certain elegance." Just fyi.
None of which, however, gets me any closer to the title of this blog-post. So.
Yesterday, at lunch with my writers' group, talk turned to the feeling of being a fuck-up, which none of us--tenured professors all, and with lovely fat vitas, etc.--has been entirely able to shake.
Then this morning, I read an interview with a homeless man in Madrid, whose friend had died in his arms of the cold. I was startled to read about his background. Fermín said,
I was seven when my parents got divorced. My mother had psychological problems her whole life. She's such a strict Jehovah’s Witness that she finds it impossible to live with someone who’s not from the same religion. She couldn't have a husband who wasn't a Jehovah’s Witness, she couldn't have friends who weren't Jehovah’s Witnesses, and her children weren't her children if they weren't Jehovah’s Witnesses. She abandoned them all; she threw me out on the street. She told me to get out of the house for not accepting the "truth". To her I don’t exist.Poor Fermín. I thought of how what we're taught early about our worth and our place in the world can affect our sense of ourselves for our whole lives. So I had to get by on my own. I thought about wildly over-confident colleagues I have known who were raised with comfort, ease, encouragement, and a sense of entitlement. Even when their work is technically kind of a yawn, they feel just fine about themselves. I had a therapist once who wondered at the fact that, given the gorier aspects of my background, I held down a job at all.
My father is on his third marriage; he likes whores and going out at night. He’s a Gitano [Spanish Gypsy]. He believes the man rules the house and is the one who makes or breaks. When things aren’t going well he ups and leaves, he abandons everything, he gets out. My father wanted nothing to do with my brother and me. My mother with that load of shit of a religion has no idea either. So I had to get by on my own.
But I think there are lots of troubled people who manage to function--and function well: to be good parents, to be socially generous and professionally competent. I know a lot of people like that, and you probably do, too.
I thought about how I still fight doubt and anxiety, and how my writer-friends at lunch came from backgrounds of painful difficulty. We're high-functioning, yes. We're relatively solvent; we're overachievers; we give back. But we still feel like fuck-ups. When the phrase "high-functioning fuck-ups" was uttered, we all laughed in recognition.
I don't need to add that the holidays, when your family is split or dead or hostile, are just that much harder. I dreamed last night my Dad was alive, and we were moving to South Carolina to live with my Aunt Lou (who doesn't actually live there), and there were palm trees and bright water like the Key West of my childhood, and she was still married to Uncle Gerry, and all the cousins were there, and we all played softball together, laughing, on a green green lawn.
Then I woke up.
At the holidays, secret weeping's entirely acceptable.
We are built to be loved and cherished. When that goes wrong, we're damaged.
Yet we are optimistic. And we are multitude. We work hard. We love our friends and our family. We go out and celebrate at little indie bookstores. We wrap presents and send our hearts out across the country to the people we miss. We forgive the shit that happened to us, and we try to change. Then we get up and do it again. We persist. We search. And we are knocked out by our gratitude just to be here, just to have this beautiful chance.
So to all of you high-functioning fuck-ups out there who hurt like hell yet still get up to wash your face every morning, I'm wishing you the very happiest of holidays. You deserve it. You've come so far. To annoy you with Hemingway's words: you're strong at the broken places--even when you feel weak and miserable there. You persist. You search. You're broken and gorgeous and kind.
And you're the folks who make the world go 'round, the folks I love the most. So take care. Stay warm.

photo by Michaela Powell
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Warmth, Books, & Cheer
If you'll be in Lincoln this Friday evening, come check out the new indie
bookstore down in the Haymarket, Indigo Bridge Books, for free in-store
coffeeshop coffee, free cinnamon rolls from locavore eatery Bread & Cup (yum), and
live music from six to nine p.m.

Creamery Building
701 P Street Suite 102
(402) 477-7770
If you haven't checked out Indigo Bridge yet, this is the perfect time. Their book selection's great (and if you see gaps, the staff is very open to suggestions--they want your expertise).
So brave the wintry mix and come have a cuppa.

photo by Michaela Powell
6:00 to 9:00 p.m.Creamery Building
701 P Street Suite 102
(402) 477-7770
If you haven't checked out Indigo Bridge yet, this is the perfect time. Their book selection's great (and if you see gaps, the staff is very open to suggestions--they want your expertise).
So brave the wintry mix and come have a cuppa.
| Tweet | ||
![]()
Conference on the Americas! and a copyright question
I'm very excited to share this news with you: the call for participation for the 10th annual Conference on the Americas has been extended to January 23, 2009. The topic this year is "Immigration: The Art and Politics of Movement," and they're configuring it expansively, so if you're doing anything connected with immigration, submit a proposal! Or just check it out!
If you go, we can hang out!--because I'll be giving the keynote address, which is tentatively titled, "Lopez from Stage to Screen: Disciplining the Borders of the Body and the Nation-State in Real Women Have Curves." This is the first time I'll have ever given a keynote lecture, so I'm excited (and nervous!). But I've been thinking about this topic for a long time now, and I have a lot to say. It's basically about the differences between the play version that Josefina Lopez originally wrote and the version that made it to the big screen (which she co-wrote with George LaVoo). The differences between the two are huge and have all sorts of really interesting ideological implications.
When I taught Chicana/Chicano lit this fall, we read/watched both versions and talked about the changes that were made. (My students were great--they saw stuff I didn't even notice.) I'm going to try to tease those out differences, and their political implications for us as artists and as audience members, in the lecture. We'll see how it goes.
But here's a snag: the organizers have scheduled the lecture in this gorgeous auditorium with a big screen, so I thought I'd be able to compare clips from the movie with scenes from the play (thus cleverly keeping the audience awake), but I learned yesterday from a colleague that showing clips from a DVD violates copyright law. Is that true? Does anybody know? How do film studies scholars illustrate their points when they give papers at conferences? Help, blog community! There's got to be a way.
If you go, we can hang out!--because I'll be giving the keynote address, which is tentatively titled, "Lopez from Stage to Screen: Disciplining the Borders of the Body and the Nation-State in Real Women Have Curves." This is the first time I'll have ever given a keynote lecture, so I'm excited (and nervous!). But I've been thinking about this topic for a long time now, and I have a lot to say. It's basically about the differences between the play version that Josefina Lopez originally wrote and the version that made it to the big screen (which she co-wrote with George LaVoo). The differences between the two are huge and have all sorts of really interesting ideological implications.
When I taught Chicana/Chicano lit this fall, we read/watched both versions and talked about the changes that were made. (My students were great--they saw stuff I didn't even notice.) I'm going to try to tease those out differences, and their political implications for us as artists and as audience members, in the lecture. We'll see how it goes.
But here's a snag: the organizers have scheduled the lecture in this gorgeous auditorium with a big screen, so I thought I'd be able to compare clips from the movie with scenes from the play (thus cleverly keeping the audience awake), but I learned yesterday from a colleague that showing clips from a DVD violates copyright law. Is that true? Does anybody know? How do film studies scholars illustrate their points when they give papers at conferences? Help, blog community! There's got to be a way.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Warm-You-Up Sunday Links
Baby, it's cold outside. In Lincoln, Nebraska, it's ten degrees, with a wind chill factor of eleven below. I hope you're warm, wherever you are (and here's a shout-out of general envy to you folks down in Texas), and if you're in a chilly spot, here's some stuff to jump-start your battery.
• Chica-lit juggernaut and general bad-ass Alisa Valdes Rodriguez calls out popular novelist Jodi Picoult for her racist stereotypes, not once but twice. Thanks, Alisa! With thanks to Tayari's blog for the heads-up.
• And speaking of Tayari Jones, if you're female and you've got some fine fiction languishing in your drawer, send it into the chapbook contest Tayari's judging at Kore Press, a women's small press that produces beautiful books. Win the contest; get an extra thousand bucks to spend. (And if you feel like supporting small presses by purchasing books as your gifts this holiday season, Kore has gorgeous fine-press editions of Audre Lorde's essay Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power, Mary Gordon's The Fascination Begins in the Mouth: Anger, and Brenda Ueland's gentle, teacherly Tell Me More: On the Fine Art of Listening. They're only $10 each, and each comes in its own envelope.)
• And speaking of holiday seasons, if you're in the mood to listen to some Hanukkah stories, "moving tales of discovery and reconciliation, the persistence of hope and the promise of undimmed light," NPR's serving up four new ones, including one by my charming friend and UNL colleague Gerry Shapiro (left).
• And speaking of contests, the estimable and inimitable Fourth Genre is running its annual essay contest. Again, you stand to win $1,000, and the nice thing is that all entrants will be considered for publication, which is no small thing, given Fourth Genre's wow factor.
Founding editor Mike Steinberg is one of the sweetest, most generous guys on the planet, and I'm excited that Fourth Genre will be running my essay, "Grip" (which the Pine Manor MFA community heard last summer in Boston), in 2009, and my lovely student Tom Coakley's "How to Speak About the Secret Desert Wars," in 2010.
Tom's piece isn't just playing bubbles in the bath, either (to borrow one of Sandra Cisneros's favorite expressions for writing lite, writing that's just fooling around): he has worked in special operations for years, and the essay's whole raison d'être is finding a way to discuss that morally murky and emotionally agonizing territory. Um, without getting court-martialed. (And we think we have issues when we publish CNF.)
• And speaking of wonderful students and their wonderful work, Madeline Wiseman's wrenching personal essay "How to Kill Butterflies" in the most recent issue of Grasslands Review has just been nominated for a Pushcart. Laaa! Yey, Madeline! Here's a characteristically unsentimental taste:
But what's good news for you is that Grasslands Review editor Brendan Corcoran is actively seeking creative nonfiction (until January), so if you have something marvelous, send it his way as an attachment to bcorcoran [at] indstate.edu.
• And for something completely different, if you're wondering why all those wonderful egalitarian men you know aren't pulling down the big bucks, organizational psychologists Timothy Judge and Beth Livingston have some (depressing) answers for you.
• In other gender news, if you've ever driven yourself slightly nuts by pondering the unsettling question, Are women set up to fail — by being appointed to positions of power only in hopeless situations?, two British researchers have an equally unsettling answer for you:
• If you were one of the apparently few and apparently silent folks who were, like me, underwhelmed by the culturally enshrined brilliance of David Foster Wallace, James Ryerson of the New York Times Magazine offers up an overview of DFW's undergraduate honors thesis, which, Ryerson claims, "casts a revealing light on the early stages of his struggle to use the powers of his formidable mind for the higher good" by managing to, um, (wait for it), prove that the future doesn't control human actions in the present.
Got that? Whew! Okay. I'm relieved--and, gee whiz, so glad the New York Times Magazine spent page-space on it. Now I'm wondering if maybe DFW had any high school term papers about the existence of God that scholars might want to investigate, or maybe some Crayola scrawls that will reveal insights about life in other galaxies . . .
• And speaking of giving books as gifts for the holidays, let me please just recommend one more for the introspective personal-growth addict on your list (even or especially if that's you): How You Do Anything Is How You Do Everything. Perhaps unbeknownst to those who know me in my academic guise, I am also a little woo-woo, a little spiritual-searchy, and this book speaks to that.
Though it has a reassuringly (or off-puttingly, depending on your aesthetic) warm, colorful, handwritten SARKy look, it's actually a kind but stern Buddhist guide about recognizing your ego's little games and learning to let go of your own crap. It's this interactive workbook--you actually fill stuff in, and occasionally draw--and it's fantastic. Here's one tiny excerpt:
• And if you have any spiritual-searchy friends, they might like this CD of mantras, Darshana: Vedic Chanting for Daily Practice, which has been road-tested by way better folks than me. The liner notes have both the Sanskrit and the English translations, and if you've ever felt a wild urge to "salute Vishnu, . . . who sports a lotus in His navel," then this CD is probably a must-have for you. You can listen to sample tracks (just little snippets--not the whole mantras, but they'll give you a sense) at the linked page. (I am personally partial to "Peace Invocation" and the pretty "Prayer in Praise of Goddess Lakshmi.")
• Last but not least, if you have any teacher-friends in your life, they might enjoy (since we're on the whole woo-woo track here) Mary Rose O'Reilley's thoughtful Radical Presence: Teaching as Contemplative Practice. O'Reilley, a Buddhist/Quaker/Catholic college professor who's Zen-like and crotchety by turns, writes,
• Chica-lit juggernaut and general bad-ass Alisa Valdes Rodriguez calls out popular novelist Jodi Picoult for her racist stereotypes, not once but twice. Thanks, Alisa! With thanks to Tayari's blog for the heads-up.
• And speaking of Tayari Jones, if you're female and you've got some fine fiction languishing in your drawer, send it into the chapbook contest Tayari's judging at Kore Press, a women's small press that produces beautiful books. Win the contest; get an extra thousand bucks to spend. (And if you feel like supporting small presses by purchasing books as your gifts this holiday season, Kore has gorgeous fine-press editions of Audre Lorde's essay Uses of the Erotic: The Erotic as Power, Mary Gordon's The Fascination Begins in the Mouth: Anger, and Brenda Ueland's gentle, teacherly Tell Me More: On the Fine Art of Listening. They're only $10 each, and each comes in its own envelope.)
• And speaking of contests, the estimable and inimitable Fourth Genre is running its annual essay contest. Again, you stand to win $1,000, and the nice thing is that all entrants will be considered for publication, which is no small thing, given Fourth Genre's wow factor.
Founding editor Mike Steinberg is one of the sweetest, most generous guys on the planet, and I'm excited that Fourth Genre will be running my essay, "Grip" (which the Pine Manor MFA community heard last summer in Boston), in 2009, and my lovely student Tom Coakley's "How to Speak About the Secret Desert Wars," in 2010.
Tom's piece isn't just playing bubbles in the bath, either (to borrow one of Sandra Cisneros's favorite expressions for writing lite, writing that's just fooling around): he has worked in special operations for years, and the essay's whole raison d'être is finding a way to discuss that morally murky and emotionally agonizing territory. Um, without getting court-martialed. (And we think we have issues when we publish CNF.)
• And speaking of wonderful students and their wonderful work, Madeline Wiseman's wrenching personal essay "How to Kill Butterflies" in the most recent issue of Grasslands Review has just been nominated for a Pushcart. Laaa! Yey, Madeline! Here's a characteristically unsentimental taste:
You, the insect inside your mother, clinging to the stem of her. You, throbbing, twitching, doubling in size, like a spider egg suspended in the corner of an ill-used window. You undetected for weeks, months. Then the calls out for the specialists with their gadgets and chemicals, their advice, their insistence on marriage. And your mother, where is she in this? Prone on the bathroom floor, not gaining weight . . .I have a piece of fiction in the issue, too, which I'll link to on my uncollected publications page as soon as I get it scanned. It's a short story, "Dinner," about a seventeen-year-old girl who drives six hundred miles to meet her biological father for the first time. Things, shall we say, get strange.
But what's good news for you is that Grasslands Review editor Brendan Corcoran is actively seeking creative nonfiction (until January), so if you have something marvelous, send it his way as an attachment to bcorcoran [at] indstate.edu.
• And for something completely different, if you're wondering why all those wonderful egalitarian men you know aren't pulling down the big bucks, organizational psychologists Timothy Judge and Beth Livingston have some (depressing) answers for you.
• In other gender news, if you've ever driven yourself slightly nuts by pondering the unsettling question, Are women set up to fail — by being appointed to positions of power only in hopeless situations?, two British researchers have an equally unsettling answer for you:
In a write-up of their experiments in The Leadership Quarterly in October, the academics, Michelle Ryan and Alex Haslam, called it “the glass cliff,” which they contend is an invisible form of prejudice. In other words, people will give women a position of power only when there’s a strong chance of failure. Why? “If someone has to be the scapegoat to take the fall, you’re not going to put your best man forward,” Ryan says. Women are thrust into desperate situations precisely because they’re likely to fail, generating “proof” that women can’t handle responsibility.This applies, they say, to racial and ethnic minorities as well--and if you're thinking of our recent U.S. presidential election, you're connecting the dots the way Clive Thompson did.
• If you were one of the apparently few and apparently silent folks who were, like me, underwhelmed by the culturally enshrined brilliance of David Foster Wallace, James Ryerson of the New York Times Magazine offers up an overview of DFW's undergraduate honors thesis, which, Ryerson claims, "casts a revealing light on the early stages of his struggle to use the powers of his formidable mind for the higher good" by managing to, um, (wait for it), prove that the future doesn't control human actions in the present.
Got that? Whew! Okay. I'm relieved--and, gee whiz, so glad the New York Times Magazine spent page-space on it. Now I'm wondering if maybe DFW had any high school term papers about the existence of God that scholars might want to investigate, or maybe some Crayola scrawls that will reveal insights about life in other galaxies . . .
• And speaking of giving books as gifts for the holidays, let me please just recommend one more for the introspective personal-growth addict on your list (even or especially if that's you): How You Do Anything Is How You Do Everything. Perhaps unbeknownst to those who know me in my academic guise, I am also a little woo-woo, a little spiritual-searchy, and this book speaks to that.
Though it has a reassuringly (or off-puttingly, depending on your aesthetic) warm, colorful, handwritten SARKy look, it's actually a kind but stern Buddhist guide about recognizing your ego's little games and learning to let go of your own crap. It's this interactive workbook--you actually fill stuff in, and occasionally draw--and it's fantastic. Here's one tiny excerpt:
Inside each of us is a "persistent voice of discontent." It talks in terms of if onlies and can never be satisfied. Its function is to keep you feeling as if there is always something missing, always something just beyond your reach, which, if only you could get to it, would finally bring you contentment.I chewed on that for a while. Check it out.What do you think would happen if you stopped believing this voice?
• And if you have any spiritual-searchy friends, they might like this CD of mantras, Darshana: Vedic Chanting for Daily Practice, which has been road-tested by way better folks than me. The liner notes have both the Sanskrit and the English translations, and if you've ever felt a wild urge to "salute Vishnu, . . . who sports a lotus in His navel," then this CD is probably a must-have for you. You can listen to sample tracks (just little snippets--not the whole mantras, but they'll give you a sense) at the linked page. (I am personally partial to "Peace Invocation" and the pretty "Prayer in Praise of Goddess Lakshmi.")
• Last but not least, if you have any teacher-friends in your life, they might enjoy (since we're on the whole woo-woo track here) Mary Rose O'Reilley's thoughtful Radical Presence: Teaching as Contemplative Practice. O'Reilley, a Buddhist/Quaker/Catholic college professor who's Zen-like and crotchety by turns, writes,
Let me return here to Parker Palmer's comment, "To teach is to create a space." For what, we wonder? Well, for whatever has to happen. The act of contemplation begins, for each of us, simply in creating a space. Of course one can go further than that, but for my part, I am still at step one. After twenty-five years of teaching, it takes all the courage I have to keep silence for a minute and a half after reading a poem aloud, or asking a question that heads us all for the depths of experience. A minute and a half of silence is, however pitiful, a space. Something can rush in, something we did not plan and cannot control; how each of us, students and teachers, experiences these "openings" (to use the Quaker term) will differ.It's the end of the semester. Hurray! Here's to being at step one and to keeping a space open! As we tumble toward our various holidays, stay warm, and celebrate "the promise of undimmed light."
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Gifts!
First of all, thank you! We've now given over $175 to the children in Haiti who are suffering from severe hunger. (Actually, we've given more than that, but some of you have been cagey about amounts. :) )
Thank you so much for your generosity and empathy. Thank you. From the heart.
Second of all, if you're giving gifts this holiday season, consider giving books. As you may know, the publishing industry, like most industries worldwide, has been hit hard by the economic downturn, and there have been layoffs galore. If you're a literature lover, give publishing a little boost with your gift budget this year. Books are relatively inexpensive, and they can convey a real message from the heart.
For my nephew Indigo, who's three now, I just got a copy of We Are All Born Free, a children's book that illustrates the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights (which had its 60th birthday yesterday!) with beautiful paintings by different artists.
I wish someone had read me the Declaration when I was three: there's a lot of stuff I would have known not to put up with! (I actually didn't learn about the Declaration--or Eleanor Roosevelt's pivotal role in it--until I was teaching college. Can you believe it? That's a crime right there.)
If there are any fourteen-year-old girls in your life with a taste for gritty, funny reading material, let me recommend Gary Soto's Accidental Love, a novel that Amara, my Little Sister through the Big Brothers Big Sisters program, completely loved. For this year's holidays, I got her Soto's short story collection Facts of Life and Sherman Alexie's hilarious (and National-Book-Award-winning) novel The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.
For myself, I got a bargain-sale copy of Toni Morrison's new novel A Mercy (which I zoomed through--more on that later) and the disturbing, important new volume Torture and Democracy, which I'm saving for après-grading. Not exactly festive fare, I guess, but it's what I wanted--and I didn't think either book would happen to show up in my stocking, so I did it myself.
Most of us are on tightened budgets this year; I know in our family, most of the adults have agreed not to exchange gifts and just get stuff for the kids instead, to lighten things for everyone. Maybe you're coming up with ways to save money, too.
But with the gifts we do give, we can support the writers we love. Happy holiday shopping!
Thank you so much for your generosity and empathy. Thank you. From the heart.
Second of all, if you're giving gifts this holiday season, consider giving books. As you may know, the publishing industry, like most industries worldwide, has been hit hard by the economic downturn, and there have been layoffs galore. If you're a literature lover, give publishing a little boost with your gift budget this year. Books are relatively inexpensive, and they can convey a real message from the heart.
For my nephew Indigo, who's three now, I just got a copy of We Are All Born Free, a children's book that illustrates the U.N. Declaration of Human Rights (which had its 60th birthday yesterday!) with beautiful paintings by different artists.
I wish someone had read me the Declaration when I was three: there's a lot of stuff I would have known not to put up with! (I actually didn't learn about the Declaration--or Eleanor Roosevelt's pivotal role in it--until I was teaching college. Can you believe it? That's a crime right there.)
If there are any fourteen-year-old girls in your life with a taste for gritty, funny reading material, let me recommend Gary Soto's Accidental Love, a novel that Amara, my Little Sister through the Big Brothers Big Sisters program, completely loved. For this year's holidays, I got her Soto's short story collection Facts of Life and Sherman Alexie's hilarious (and National-Book-Award-winning) novel The Absolutely True Diary of a Part-Time Indian.
For myself, I got a bargain-sale copy of Toni Morrison's new novel A Mercy (which I zoomed through--more on that later) and the disturbing, important new volume Torture and Democracy, which I'm saving for après-grading. Not exactly festive fare, I guess, but it's what I wanted--and I didn't think either book would happen to show up in my stocking, so I did it myself.
Most of us are on tightened budgets this year; I know in our family, most of the adults have agreed not to exchange gifts and just get stuff for the kids instead, to lighten things for everyone. Maybe you're coming up with ways to save money, too.
But with the gifts we do give, we can support the writers we love. Happy holiday shopping!
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Sad
The New York Times is my paper of choice, but it's hard to take to the gym.
I was jogging along on the treadmill last night, reading my (bouncing) copy of The Week, getting jolts and snippets about Mumbai, Obama's team, the recession, why Jennifer Aniston doesn't want my pity . . . so imagine my surprise when the tiny rural town where I lived for ten years suddenly jumped off the page at me:
Alas, the "punch that 'makes girls easier'" sounded all too familiar as well; sexism and homophobia were still fairly prevalent in campus culture when I left a year and a half ago--another issue faculty members raised repeatedly, also to little avail. A "boys will be boys" attitude prevailed.
Wabash College was a strange mix: immaculately professional, serious, intellectually exciting, and gender-neutral in the classroom and in settings like job talks, and wildly not-so outside those formal situations. I always saw why such a setting would appeal to 18- to 22-year-olds, but I was never sure why alumni, trustees, and administrators thought it was a good idea.
For me, as a feminist and a progressive, it was an uneasy place: both strongly supportive of my work, officially and informally, and a demoralizing place to be on a day-to-day basis. Why did I take a job there? Well, people were wonderful when I interviewed, and my job talk, which pulled no punches about a non-canonical feminist writer (who wrote about abortion in the 1930s, no less), was enthusiastically received, so I thought I'd be a good fit. It seemed like a lovely place.
It was only after I arrived there to stay--moving my family across the country, etc.--that the disturbing cracks began to show. By then, I felt committed. During my time there, I worked to get tenure, made good friends on the faculty, taught some lovely students, and worked to make positive change on campus.
But sometimes institutions don't want to change. By the time I got the call from UNL, I was emotionally exhausted and happy to move on.
According to the AP story,
I'm so sorry for the families of the two boys. As the mother of a twenty-year-old son (who's also far away at college), I can only imagine their grief and hurt. I hope Wabash uses this painful opportunity not just to disband the culpable fraternity but also to look closely at the college's whole culture.
Yes, students drink. I drank in college. Probably we all drank in college, and more than we should have.
But for an eighteen-year-old, legally unable to buy his own alcohol, to have a blood-alcohol level of .40, while his older "brothers" looked on--well, that's unconscionable.
I was jogging along on the treadmill last night, reading my (bouncing) copy of The Week, getting jolts and snippets about Mumbai, Obama's team, the recession, why Jennifer Aniston doesn't want my pity . . . so imagine my surprise when the tiny rural town where I lived for ten years suddenly jumped off the page at me:
Crawfordsville, Ind.It was sad--but, though startling, not a surprise. I taught at Wabash for ten years, and worried faculty members had been raising the issue of excessive alcohol consumption--to little effect--since I arrived on campus in 1997. Approximately 70% of the students lived in fraternities when I was there. Many of us thought the drinking situation was an accident waiting to happen.
Frat booted after death: Joining a growing national trend, Wabash College, a small men’s school in Indiana, this week disbanded a fraternity following the alcohol-poisoning death of a freshman pledge. Wabash administrators revoked the charter of the Delta Tau Delta fraternity after Johnny Smith, 18, died during a frat-house party that, its hosts boasted, featured several kegs of beer and a punch that “makes girls easier.” Smith’s blood-alcohol level was .40, more than five times Indiana’s legal limit. Fraternity members are twice as likely to binge-drink as other college students, and at least a dozen schools have banned fraternities or barred them from serving alcohol. An estimated 1,400 college students die every year of alcohol-related causes. (http://www.theweek.com/home)
Alas, the "punch that 'makes girls easier'" sounded all too familiar as well; sexism and homophobia were still fairly prevalent in campus culture when I left a year and a half ago--another issue faculty members raised repeatedly, also to little avail. A "boys will be boys" attitude prevailed.
Wabash College was a strange mix: immaculately professional, serious, intellectually exciting, and gender-neutral in the classroom and in settings like job talks, and wildly not-so outside those formal situations. I always saw why such a setting would appeal to 18- to 22-year-olds, but I was never sure why alumni, trustees, and administrators thought it was a good idea.
For me, as a feminist and a progressive, it was an uneasy place: both strongly supportive of my work, officially and informally, and a demoralizing place to be on a day-to-day basis. Why did I take a job there? Well, people were wonderful when I interviewed, and my job talk, which pulled no punches about a non-canonical feminist writer (who wrote about abortion in the 1930s, no less), was enthusiastically received, so I thought I'd be a good fit. It seemed like a lovely place.
It was only after I arrived there to stay--moving my family across the country, etc.--that the disturbing cracks began to show. By then, I felt committed. During my time there, I worked to get tenure, made good friends on the faculty, taught some lovely students, and worked to make positive change on campus.
But sometimes institutions don't want to change. By the time I got the call from UNL, I was emotionally exhausted and happy to move on.
According to the AP story,
[Johnny] Smith's death was the second in about a year at Wabash in which alcohol may have played a part. A 19-year-old Wabash freshman died in October 2007 when he slipped and fell from a roof at the campus in Crawfordsville, about 40 miles northwest of Indianapolis. Tests showed he had been drinking.Two alcohol-related deaths in two years. Not a very good ratio at a college of fewer than 900 students.
I'm so sorry for the families of the two boys. As the mother of a twenty-year-old son (who's also far away at college), I can only imagine their grief and hurt. I hope Wabash uses this painful opportunity not just to disband the culpable fraternity but also to look closely at the college's whole culture.
Yes, students drink. I drank in college. Probably we all drank in college, and more than we should have.
But for an eighteen-year-old, legally unable to buy his own alcohol, to have a blood-alcohol level of .40, while his older "brothers" looked on--well, that's unconscionable.
| Tweet | ||
Categories:
![]()
Editing Yourself: The Serpentine Search
It's nearly the end of the semester, and my graduate CW students are still churning out gorgeous, moving work. Unbelievable. They're just fantastic.
One thing students sometimes ask me for is a recommendation for a book about revising/editing their own work, and I usually come up short, because although I really love several books about writing, the idea of a whole book about editing sounds deadly, so I don't usually pick up books like that in the first place. Yawnfest.
I've recommended Betsy Lerner's The Forest for the Trees: An Editor's Advice to Writers before, but I'm not wild about it: honestly, it's a little too big-picture for what most students are seeking. They want something more hands-on, more immediately useful. John Gardner's "Common Errors" chapter in The Art of Fiction is just as useful for writers of nonfiction as it is for fiction writers, if you can get past his persnickety tone (his advice on getting rid of filters and on letting sentences' structures echo their sense is, by itself, worth the price of the book--especially for those memoirists who want to open every paragraph with "I remember"), and of course there's always Strunk and White. But nothing perfect ever crossed my path.
However, I discovered a wonderful, helpful book over the Thanksgiving break, and I'm hoping I may have at last found the editing-book grail. The Artful Edit: On the Practice of Editing Yourself by Susan Bell is really turning out to be exactly what the New York Times said it was: "Short, helpful, original."
Here's Bell herself:
I like Bell's non-invasive, non-intrusive approach, too. Her thoughts on editing run parallel to my own views on teaching:
Bell's first chapter offers eleven practical strategies for gaining distance on your text, and I was heartened by her suggestions, since I've used several of them myself and can attest to their effectiveness--like
I'm hoping the whole book turns out to be as good. In the meantime, consider it a recommendation. Happy editing!
One thing students sometimes ask me for is a recommendation for a book about revising/editing their own work, and I usually come up short, because although I really love several books about writing, the idea of a whole book about editing sounds deadly, so I don't usually pick up books like that in the first place. Yawnfest.
I've recommended Betsy Lerner's The Forest for the Trees: An Editor's Advice to Writers before, but I'm not wild about it: honestly, it's a little too big-picture for what most students are seeking. They want something more hands-on, more immediately useful. John Gardner's "Common Errors" chapter in The Art of Fiction is just as useful for writers of nonfiction as it is for fiction writers, if you can get past his persnickety tone (his advice on getting rid of filters and on letting sentences' structures echo their sense is, by itself, worth the price of the book--especially for those memoirists who want to open every paragraph with "I remember"), and of course there's always Strunk and White. But nothing perfect ever crossed my path.
However, I discovered a wonderful, helpful book over the Thanksgiving break, and I'm hoping I may have at last found the editing-book grail. The Artful Edit: On the Practice of Editing Yourself by Susan Bell is really turning out to be exactly what the New York Times said it was: "Short, helpful, original."
Here's Bell herself:Um, yep. Tell me about it. So it's nice that she gets writers, rather than looking down on us as the slobs whose work she's been hired to correct. And:"Writers live with many fears--of success, of failure, of a ten-year project garnering a one-year paycheck. Their greatest fear, however, is of their own intimate voice, and they find many ways to subvert hearing it."
"We are loath to put an objective ear to our subjective selves. But to edit is to listen, above all; to hear past the emotional filters that distort the sound of our all too human words; and then to make choices rather than judgments."Choices rather than judgments. Nice.
I like Bell's non-invasive, non-intrusive approach, too. Her thoughts on editing run parallel to my own views on teaching:
There are those who believe that providing answers to a writer's questions or solutions to his errors is the definition of editing. Answers, however, halt the serpentine search that a writer often needs to make to solve a problem. New valuable ideas may appear during the search. This doesn't mean that an editor can't sometimes find the right word or phrase before a writer does. It happens. But the few words found can't compare to the verbal clusters a text needs that the writer alone can find. Answers are a very small part of the job. Guidance is the gist. A text deserves to be pondered and nudged, not simply bullied into place. No editor can, with crystal clarity, know the precise place her author's work ought to go.Nor can any teacher. Which is not to say that there's no time and place for a clear No. :)
Bell's first chapter offers eleven practical strategies for gaining distance on your text, and I was heartened by her suggestions, since I've used several of them myself and can attest to their effectiveness--like
writing your first draft longhand,(I've done both of these last ones, though I haven't yet hung it on a clothesline, as she suggests.) For this last, if you're working with a long manuscript, print it out in a wee font. Then "[p]eruse for proportions," as Bell says. She has several more strategies that I look forward to trying.
reading your work aloud (to yourself or a bribed loved one),
editing your printouts in a different physical space from where you write, and
laying the printout out on the floor or taping it to the wall to get a sense of structure.
I'm hoping the whole book turns out to be as good. In the meantime, consider it a recommendation. Happy editing!
| Tweet | ||
![]()


